blokt.com
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high.
- Global Rank
- #92,576
▲ 20,990
- Rank in TLD
- #40,607
▲ 7,892
- Referring Domains
- 691
▲ 25
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 19.2
- Subdomains
- 3
- Domain age
- 14 yr 6 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 19.2
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 13.0
- Referring Domains
- 691
- Linked Domains
- 1,169
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 236
10–19 223
20–29 74
30–39 68
40–49 47
50–59 24
60–69 10
70–79 7
80–89 1
90–100 1
Total 691
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| harvard.edu | 83.6 | #218 |
| yale.edu | 77.6 | #756 |
| washington.edu | 77.0 | #868 |
| duke.edu | 76.0 | #1,046 |
| vuejs.org | 75.4 | #1,194 |
| tradingview.com | 73.7 | #1,645 |
| pymnts.com | 73.2 | #1,855 |
| iastate.edu | 70.1 | #3,348 |
| siliconangle.com | 69.6 | #3,606 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 10 Apr 2012
- Last updated
- 8 Apr 2026
- Expires
- 10 Apr 2027 (156 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Internet Domain Service BS Corp.
Subdomain
cd.blokt.comcdn.blokt.comwww.blokt.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | blokt.com | 300 | 134.209.219.65 |
| MX | blokt.com | 300 | 10 mx.zoho.eu |
| MX | blokt.com | 300 | 20 mx2.zoho.eu |
| MX | blokt.com | 300 | 50 mx3.zoho.eu |
| NS | blokt.com | 86400 | isaac.ns.cloudflare.com |
| NS | blokt.com | 86400 | lisa.ns.cloudflare.com |
| SOA | blokt.com | 1800 | isaac.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2416546672 10000 2400 604800 1800 |
| TXT | blokt.com | 300 | google-site-verification=S4gHusa85k4p3hTvVzt_ENA1sgaQLYZiXrVPMLyITac |
| TXT | blokt.com | 300 | v=spf1 include:zoho.eu ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.