block-builders.de
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #2,085,265
▼ 91,573
- Rank in TLD
- #99,186
▼ 5,320
- Referring Domains
- 113
▲ 5
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.3
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.3
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 26.1
- Referring Domains
- 113
- Linked Domains
- 1,178
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 13
10–19 28
20–29 29
30–39 22
40–49 9
50–59 9
60–69 1
70–79 1
80–89 1
90–100 0
Total 113
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| deloitte.com | 81.7 | #333 |
| sendgrid.net | 70.9 | #2,837 |
| bitcointalk.org | 64.7 | #7,861 |
| homepagemodules.de | 54.3 | #46,943 |
| cryptonews.net | 54.2 | #47,649 |
| cash-online.de | 51.4 | #76,455 |
| btc-echo.de | 50.8 | #83,879 |
| ioplus.nl | 50.7 | #86,194 |
| bitcoinwiki.org | 50.7 | #85,143 |
| private-banking-magazin.de | 50.7 | #85,327 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .deGermany
- Last updated
- 13 Oct 2018
- Domain statuses
- active
- Registry
- DENIC eG
Subdomain
www.block-builders.de
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | block-builders.de | 150 | 81.169.145.84 |
| AAAA | block-builders.de | 150 | 2a01:238:20a:202:1084:: |
| MX | block-builders.de | 150 | 5 smtpin.rzone.de |
| NS | block-builders.de | 150 | shades02.rzone.de |
| NS | block-builders.de | 150 | docks01.rzone.de |
| SOA | block-builders.de | 150 | shades02.rzone.de. hostmaster.strato-rz.de. 2020063028 86400 7200 604800 300 |
| TXT | block-builders.de | 150 | google-site-verification=4-reKgb_x9IdCAfVCdJ8xf7oqX0vIMmoFXV7p00qlEs |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.