bigdayofgiving.org
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #199,490
▲ 42,016
- Rank in TLD
- #22,881
▲ 4,507
- Referring Domains
- 339
▲ 21
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 28.0
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 12 yr 6 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 28.0
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 25.4
- Referring Domains
- 339
- Linked Domains
- 702
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 13
10–19 92
20–29 117
30–39 64
40–49 29
50–59 9
60–69 5
70–79 5
80–89 4
90–100 1
Total 339
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| squarespace.com | 90.3 | #46 |
| linktr.ee | 84.7 | #161 |
| iheart.com | 81.0 | #389 |
| cbsnews.com | 80.9 | #405 |
| constantcontact.com | 80.6 | #429 |
| redcross.org | 75.2 | #1,227 |
| activehosted.com | 75.0 | #1,278 |
| ucdavis.edu | 74.8 | #1,331 |
| wildapricot.org | 74.0 | #1,551 |
| govdelivery.com | 73.3 | #1,810 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .org
- Registration date
- 7 Apr 2014
- Last updated
- 12 Aug 2026
- Expires
- 7 Apr 2027 (153 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- Public Interest Registry (PIR)
- Registrar
- Network Solutions, LLC
Subdomain
www.bigdayofgiving.org
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | bigdayofgiving.org | 300 | 35.163.70.83 |
| MX | bigdayofgiving.org | 300 | 1 bigdayofgiving-org.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | bigdayofgiving.org | 172800 | ns-1466.awsdns-55.org |
| NS | bigdayofgiving.org | 172800 | ns-1586.awsdns-06.co.uk |
| NS | bigdayofgiving.org | 172800 | ns-494.awsdns-61.com |
| NS | bigdayofgiving.org | 172800 | ns-689.awsdns-22.net |
| SOA | bigdayofgiving.org | 900 | ns-1466.awsdns-55.org. awsdns-hostmaster.amazon.com. 1 7200 900 1209600 86400 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.