big-i.ru
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #178,813
▼ 4,596
- Rank in TLD
- #2,598
▲ 66
- Referring Domains
- 294
▼ 10
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 21.9
- Subdomains
- 3
- Domain age
- 4 yr 4 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 21.9
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 18.6
- Referring Domains
- 294
- Linked Domains
- 1,604
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 77
10–19 77
20–29 61
30–39 36
40–49 17
50–59 14
60–69 8
70–79 1
80–89 1
90–100 2
Total 294
Referring Domains
Basic Information
- TLD
- .ruRussia
- Registration date
- 21 Jun 2022
- Expires
- 21 Jun 2027 (228 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- REGISTERED DELEGATED UNVERIFIED
- Registry
- Coordination Center for TLD RU
- Registrar
- RU-CENTER-RU
Subdomain
events.big-i.ruinfo.big-i.ruwww.big-i.ru
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | big-i.ru | 3600 | 31.200.248.9 |
| MX | big-i.ru | 21600 | 10 mx.yandex.net |
| NS | big-i.ru | 3600 | ns3-l2.nic.ru |
| NS | big-i.ru | 3600 | ns4-l2.nic.ru |
| NS | big-i.ru | 3600 | ns8-l2.nic.ru |
| NS | big-i.ru | 3600 | ns4-cloud.nic.ru |
| NS | big-i.ru | 3600 | ns8-cloud.nic.ru |
| SOA | big-i.ru | 3600 | ns3-l2.nic.ru. dns.nic.ru. 2022062168 1440 3600 2592000 600 |
| TXT | big-i.ru | 3600 | MS=ms95585571 |
| TXT | big-i.ru | 3600 | yandex-verification: c0610fe39fd488e2 |
| TXT | big-i.ru | 3600 | google-site-verification=sJQ6TOEdpvhkBMKzXr8JUPKfeO_DJGAWkdQTvx3vvVs |
| TXT | big-i.ru | 3600 | _globalsign-domain-verification=85jF77tt5aSnL25YI_ZgUoHF_QGcsIVshsY1z8YMoB |
| TXT | big-i.ru | 3600 | v=spf1 redirect=_spf.yandex.net include:spf.unisender.com include:spf.mindbox.ru include:_spf.yandex.net ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Configuration error
SPF exceeds the limit of 10 DNS lookups.
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.