bankactivities.com
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #24,106,832
▼ 2,802,768
- Rank in TLD
- #10,602,501
▼ 1,322,724
- Referring Domains
- 5
▼ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 42.7
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 11 yr 1 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 42.7
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 35.8
- Referring Domains
- 5
- Linked Domains
- 1,640
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 0
20–29 1
30–39 2
40–49 1
50–59 0
60–69 1
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 5
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| follow.it | 69.6 | #3,635 |
| budgetsaresexy.com | 47.9 | #138,160 |
| tbmgroup.eu | 35.8 | #861,680 |
| oppalerts.com | 31.8 | #1,668,580 |
| onecentatatime.com | 28.2 | #2,963,881 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 20 Sept 2015
- Last updated
- 7 Sept 2026
- Expires
- 20 Sept 2028 (685 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- NAMECHEAP INC
Subdomain
www.bankactivities.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | bankactivities.com | 7200 | 88.198.195.17 |
| AAAA | bankactivities.com | 7200 | 2a01:4f8:d0a:10fc::2 |
| MX | bankactivities.com | 7200 | 10 www132.your-server.de |
| NS | bankactivities.com | 7200 | ns3.second-ns.de |
| NS | bankactivities.com | 7200 | ns.second-ns.com |
| NS | bankactivities.com | 7200 | ns1.your-server.de |
| SOA | bankactivities.com | 7200 | ns1.your-server.de. postmaster.your-server.de. 2026101300 86400 10800 3600000 3600 |
| TXT | bankactivities.com | 7200 | v=spf1 +a +mx ?all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Warning
This SPF policy uses +all or has no all mechanism. Check whether the sender restrictions are appropriate, and consider ~all or -all if needed.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.