Skip to content

backronym.fail

  • Domain Power ranking within .fail: #23

Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. Only a small number of referring domains were found in the observed data.

Domain Power Rank
33.2
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#1,377,227

▲ 1,858,430

Rank in TLD
#23

▲ 13

Referring Domains
16

▲ 7

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
48.5
Subdomains
0
Domain age
–

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
redhat.com78.4#657
ycombinator.com78.0#705
mysql.com77.2#818
archlinux.org73.4#1,752
mariadb.org66.7#5,799
uberspace.de65.3#7,132
openwall.com64.4#8,179
securityaffairs.com63.0#10,322
root.cz57.5#27,477
chedong.com36.2#815,986

Basic Information

TLD
.fail

No registration data could be retrieved.

Subdomain

No Observed Data

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
Abackronym.fail300216.239.36.21
Abackronym.fail300216.239.38.21
Abackronym.fail300216.239.32.21
Abackronym.fail300216.239.34.21
NSbackronym.fail172800ns-107.awsdns-13.com
NSbackronym.fail172800ns-1183.awsdns-19.org
NSbackronym.fail172800ns-1963.awsdns-53.co.uk
NSbackronym.fail172800ns-750.awsdns-29.net
SOAbackronym.fail900ns-1963.awsdns-53.co.uk. awsdns-hostmaster.amazon.com. 1 7200 900 1209600 86400
CAAbackronym.fail3000 issue "amazon.com"
CAAbackronym.fail3000 issue "amazonaws.com"
CAAbackronym.fail3000 issue "amazontrust.com"
CAAbackronym.fail3000 issue "awstrust.com"
CAAbackronym.fail3000 issue "digicert.com"
CAAbackronym.fail3000 issue "globalsign.com"
CAAbackronym.fail3000 issue "identrust.com"
CAAbackronym.fail3000 issue "letsencrypt.org"
CAAbackronym.fail3000 issue "pki.goog"
CAAbackronym.fail3000 issue "starfieldtech.com"

Email Authentication

MX
Warning

No MX record was found, but mail delivery may fall back to this domain’s A or AAAA record.

SPF
Not configured

No matching DNS record was found.

DMARC
Not configured

DMARC is not configured.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.