azom.com
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high.
- Global Rank
- #42,421
▲ 374
- Rank in TLD
- #19,138
▼ 14
- Referring Domains
- 2,932
▲ 102
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 26.2
- Subdomains
- 12
- Domain age
- 26 yr 11 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 26.2
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 22.2
- Referring Domains
- 2,932
- Linked Domains
- 5,058
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 384
10–19 863
20–29 746
30–39 416
40–49 208
50–59 146
60–69 93
70–79 59
80–89 14
90–100 3
Total 2,932
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| europa.eu | 90.5 | #44 |
| bit.ly | 88.4 | #67 |
| nih.gov | 87.1 | #91 |
| bing.com | 84.6 | #166 |
| substack.com | 84.4 | #173 |
| harvard.edu | 83.6 | #218 |
| stanford.edu | 83.3 | #237 |
| mit.edu | 83.2 | #238 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 5 Dec 1999
- Last updated
- 31 Oct 2026
- Expires
- 5 Dec 2027 (395 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- GANDI SAS
Subdomain
ar.azom.comde.azom.comel.azom.comes.azom.comfr.azom.comit.azom.comja.azom.comko.azom.compt.azom.comru.azom.comwww.azom.comzh-cn.azom.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | azom.com | 300 | 104.20.24.130 |
| A | azom.com | 300 | 172.66.163.56 |
| MX | azom.com | 3600 | 0 azom-com.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | azom.com | 86400 | kanye.ns.cloudflare.com |
| NS | azom.com | 86400 | lorna.ns.cloudflare.com |
| SOA | azom.com | 1800 | kanye.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2418857167 10000 2400 604800 1800 |
| TXT | azom.com | 300 | MS=ms78111652 |
| TXT | azom.com | 300 | v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all |
| TXT | azom.com | 300 | facebook-domain-verification=9nhy21qgbmirs6r02gv71qdrd0ynad |
| TXT | azom.com | 300 | google-site-verification=TMB4Tt61-Janf3bDneOU9rhb-SFcLuxyVuazVLQoVNM |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.