avinal.space
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #11,274,711
▼ 6,433,216
- Rank in TLD
- #7,102
▼ 4,508
- Referring Domains
- 4
▼ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 35.2
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 5 yr 8 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 35.2
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 29.5
- Referring Domains
- 4
- Linked Domains
- 89
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 1
20–29 1
30–39 1
40–49 0
50–59 0
60–69 1
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 4
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| sourceware.org | 68.6 | #4,361 |
| githubcampus.expert | 35.1 | #979,907 |
| elmweekly.nl | 23.8 | #5,613,988 |
| smartstimer.com | 13.1 | #25,707,433 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .space
- Registration date
- 8 Feb 2021
- Last updated
- 11 Jul 2025
- Expires
- 8 Feb 2027 (95 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientDeleteProhibited clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- Radix Technologies Inc.
- Registrar
- Porkbun LLC
Subdomain
gsoc.avinal.space
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | avinal.space | 600 | 75.2.60.5 |
| MX | avinal.space | 600 | 10 mail.protonmail.ch |
| MX | avinal.space | 600 | 20 mailsec.protonmail.ch |
| NS | avinal.space | 86400 | maceio.ns.porkbun.com |
| NS | avinal.space | 86400 | curitiba.ns.porkbun.com |
| NS | avinal.space | 86400 | salvador.ns.porkbun.com |
| NS | avinal.space | 86400 | fortaleza.ns.porkbun.com |
| SOA | avinal.space | 1800 | curitiba.ns.porkbun.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2419278869 10000 2400 604800 1800 |
| TXT | avinal.space | 600 | v=spf1 include:_spf.protonmail.ch ~all |
| TXT | avinal.space | 600 | protonmail-verification=e379949a64b4f214359edfe51f16461ca4b89090 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=quarantine, asking receiving servers to quarantine messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.