aulp.org
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #825,740
▲ 45,231
- Rank in TLD
- #89,623
▲ 3,029
- Referring Domains
- 124
▼ 12
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 39.7
- Subdomains
- 6
- Domain age
- 27 yr 0 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 39.7
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 39.9
- Referring Domains
- 124
- Linked Domains
- 143
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 8
10–19 16
20–29 15
30–39 23
40–49 20
50–59 28
60–69 9
70–79 2
80–89 1
90–100 2
Total 124
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| squarespace.com | 90.3 | #46 |
| wikimedia.org | 85.2 | #150 |
| usp.br | 71.7 | #2,477 |
| wikidata.org | 71.6 | #2,513 |
| unicamp.br | 66.1 | #6,279 |
| wes.org | 66.0 | #6,430 |
| ufmg.br | 65.6 | #6,812 |
| up.pt | 65.1 | #7,353 |
| ulisboa.pt | 64.7 | #7,828 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .org
- Registration date
- 22 Oct 1999
- Last updated
- 12 Aug 2026
- Expires
- 22 Oct 2027 (351 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientDeleteProhibited clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- Public Interest Registry (PIR)
- Registrar
- OVH, SAS
Subdomain
encontro.aulp.orgmobilidade.aulp.orgproctemmais.aulp.orgproculturamais.aulp.orgprosaudemais.aulp.orgwww.aulp.org
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | aulp.org | 3600 | 46.105.159.179 |
| MX | aulp.org | 3600 | 0 aulp-org.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | aulp.org | 3600 | ns10.ovh.net |
| NS | aulp.org | 3600 | dns10.ovh.net |
| SOA | aulp.org | 3600 | dns10.ovh.net. tech.ovh.net. 2025101502 86400 3600 3600000 60 |
| TXT | aulp.org | 3600 | v=msv1 t=f6e7306570a24d86f9bb6ba1c6c91e |
| TXT | aulp.org | 3600 | v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.