attend.jp
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high.
- Global Rank
- #61,995
▼ 2,334
- Rank in TLD
- #1,485
▲ 14
- Referring Domains
- 602
▼ 7
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 14.0
- Subdomains
- 12
- Domain age
- 25 yr 1 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 14.0
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 14.1
- Referring Domains
- 602
- Linked Domains
- 264
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 190
10–19 303
20–29 87
30–39 9
40–49 9
50–59 1
60–69 1
70–79 1
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 602
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wordpress.org | 93.7 | #18 |
| shop-pro.jp | 76.1 | #1,030 |
| en-gage.net | 68.2 | #4,609 |
| n-works.link | 50.2 | #92,608 |
| web-kanji.com | 47.1 | #156,859 |
| imitsu.jp | 46.3 | #181,429 |
| andmedia.co.jp | 45.5 | #206,694 |
| attend.co.jp | 43.9 | #266,361 |
| yuryoweb.com | 43.0 | #303,787 |
| nagaoka-newotani.co.jp | 42.1 | #351,647 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .jpJapan
- Registration date
- 25 Sept 2001
- Last updated
- 30 Sept 2026
- Expires
- 30 Sept 2027 (329 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- Active
- Registry
- Japan Registry Services Co., Ltd.
Subdomain
axa.attend.jpcdn.attend.jpdata.attend.jpkamimura.attend.jpnews.attend.jprismoni.attend.jpssl.attend.jpssl2.attend.jpssl3.attend.jpv284.attend.jpwebpt.attend.jpwww.attend.jp
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | attend.jp | 300 | 183.181.85.98 |
| MX | attend.jp | 300 | 10 mgws260-2.kagoya.net |
| MX | attend.jp | 300 | 10 mgws260-1.kagoya.net |
| NS | attend.jp | 300 | ns.attendex.net |
| NS | attend.jp | 300 | dnsv1.nabic.jp |
| SOA | attend.jp | 300 | ns.attendex.net. admin.attendex.net. 2026102824 2880 1440 60480 8640 |
| TXT | attend.jp | 300 | google-site-verification=UI71lCnttZ799RX2hsWWz5r2OMwykwkUQONWPBkZO3o |
| TXT | attend.jp | 300 | v=spf1 +a +mx include:kagoya.net +ip4:117.102.175.0/24 +ip4:221.120.169.0/24 ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.