ateneopopularalcorcon.net
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #851,200
▲ 58,222
- Rank in TLD
- #28,253
▲ 2,341
- Referring Domains
- 10
▼ 2
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 24.8
- Subdomains
- 0
- Domain age
- 13 yr 9 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 24.8
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 13.6
- Referring Domains
- 10
- Linked Domains
- 2,473
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 3
10–19 3
20–29 2
30–39 0
40–49 0
50–59 1
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 10
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| squat.net | 50.2 | #92,966 |
| wanawake.es | 24.4 | #5,177,481 |
| barriocanino.blogspot.com | 21.2 | #8,029,136 |
| asthaivf.com | 14.5 | #21,230,300 |
| solizer.org | 12.6 | #27,573,764 |
| mc-metals.com | 10.2 | #39,098,396 |
| sailpointpg.com | 8.0 | #53,712,676 |
| growupadsagency.com | 5.9 | #74,351,128 |
| airportdeluxegreenvilla.com | 0.7 | #131,004,650 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .net
- Registration date
- 22 Jan 2013
- Last updated
- 13 Mar 2026
- Expires
- 22 Jan 2027 (79 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- ok
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Cronon GmbH
Subdomain
No data
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | ateneopopularalcorcon.net | 150 | 81.169.145.157 |
| AAAA | ateneopopularalcorcon.net | 150 | 2a01:238:20a:202:1157:: |
| MX | ateneopopularalcorcon.net | 150 | 5 smtp.rzone.de |
| NS | ateneopopularalcorcon.net | 150 | docks15.rzone.de |
| NS | ateneopopularalcorcon.net | 150 | shades11.rzone.de |
| SOA | ateneopopularalcorcon.net | 150 | docks15.rzone.de. hostmaster.strato-rz.de. 2020070316 86400 7200 604800 300 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.