asiaplustj.info
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #187,320
▼ 12,726
- Rank in TLD
- #661
▼ 36
- Referring Domains
- 970
▼ 24
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 30.5
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- No data
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 30.5
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 28.6
- Referring Domains
- 970
- Linked Domains
- 544
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 103
10–19 198
20–29 222
30–39 175
40–49 126
50–59 89
60–69 33
70–79 16
80–89 7
90–100 1
Total 970
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| nih.gov | 87.1 | #91 |
| wikimedia.org | 85.2 | #150 |
| substack.com | 84.4 | #173 |
| mail.ru | 83.1 | #245 |
| tilda.ws | 82.3 | #295 |
| constantcontact.com | 80.6 | #429 |
| worldbank.org | 80.5 | #446 |
| rambler.ru | 76.3 | #991 |
| rbc.ru | 75.7 | #1,129 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .info
No registration data could be retrieved.
Subdomain
old.asiaplustj.infowww.asiaplustj.info
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | asiaplustj.info | 300 | 172.66.145.173 |
| A | asiaplustj.info | 300 | 104.20.17.194 |
| AAAA | asiaplustj.info | 300 | 2606:4700:10::ac42:91ad |
| AAAA | asiaplustj.info | 300 | 2606:4700:10::6814:11c2 |
| NS | asiaplustj.info | 86400 | achiel.ns.cloudflare.com |
| NS | asiaplustj.info | 86400 | jacqueline.ns.cloudflare.com |
| SOA | asiaplustj.info | 1800 | achiel.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2417896590 10000 2400 604800 1800 |
| TXT | asiaplustj.info | 300 | google-site-verification=Nf4KjCcJgyledetz2DwqfjCUgu2BjLmCjkIc0OUDt2E |
| TXT | asiaplustj.info | 300 | yandex-verification: 3fb792649530a713 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Warning
No MX record was found, but mail delivery may fall back to this domain’s A or AAAA record.
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.