arnet.pt
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low. This domain was registered at least three years ago. Only a small number of referring domains were found in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #4,637,264
▲ 1,098,723
- Rank in TLD
- #7,992
▲ 1,949
- Referring Domains
- 24
▲ 2
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 39.0
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 3 yr 5 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 39.0
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 40.7
- Referring Domains
- 24
- Linked Domains
- 77
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 2
10–19 4
20–29 2
30–39 3
40–49 4
50–59 5
60–69 4
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 24
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| sapo.pt | 69.0 | #4,054 |
| ulisboa.pt | 64.7 | #7,828 |
| unl.pt | 63.6 | #9,301 |
| uminho.pt | 62.4 | #11,411 |
| uevora.pt | 57.3 | #28,360 |
| fct.pt | 55.4 | #38,884 |
| ualg.pt | 54.4 | #46,317 |
| ipleiria.pt | 53.7 | #52,285 |
| cienciavitae.pt | 52.6 | #62,180 |
| aprh.pt | 44.9 | #225,850 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .ptPortugal
- Registration date
- 2 Jun 2023
- Expires
- 2 Jun 2027 (209 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- Registered
- Registry
- Associação DNS.PT
Subdomain
datahub.arnet.ptplataforma.arnet.pt
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | arnet.pt | 3600 | 51.210.255.173 |
| MX | arnet.pt | 3600 | 1 mx0.mail.ovh.net |
| MX | arnet.pt | 3600 | 5 mx1.mail.ovh.net |
| MX | arnet.pt | 3600 | 50 mx2.mail.ovh.net |
| MX | arnet.pt | 3600 | 100 mx3.mail.ovh.net |
| NS | arnet.pt | 3600 | ns106.ovh.net |
| NS | arnet.pt | 3600 | dns106.ovh.net |
| SOA | arnet.pt | 3600 | dns106.ovh.net. tech.ovh.net. 2091790311 86400 3600 3600000 60 |
| TXT | arnet.pt | 3600 | 1|www.arnet.pt |
| TXT | arnet.pt | 3600 | v=spf1 include:mx.ovh.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.