aris-journal.com
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #11,799,023
▼ 882,111
- Rank in TLD
- #5,096,191
▼ 424,354
- Referring Domains
- 8
▼ 2
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 44.1
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 5 yr 3 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 44.1
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 47.3
- Referring Domains
- 8
- Linked Domains
- 64
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 1
20–29 1
30–39 1
40–49 1
50–59 2
60–69 1
70–79 1
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 8
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| hostingersite.com | 75.8 | #1,097 |
| unipi.it | 66.9 | #5,638 |
| cienciavitae.pt | 52.6 | #62,180 |
| wikicfp.com | 52.2 | #66,331 |
| call4paper.com | 42.3 | #337,927 |
| aim.asso.fr | 30.8 | #1,947,935 |
| iscsi-conference.org | 21.7 | #7,520,335 |
| lapi2s.org | 10.1 | #39,598,058 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 8 Jul 2021
- Last updated
- 22 Jun 2026
- Expires
- 8 Jul 2027 (245 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com
Subdomain
www.aris-journal.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | aris-journal.com | 3600 | 185.83.250.70 |
| MX | aris-journal.com | 3600 | 0 aris-journal.com |
| NS | aris-journal.com | 86400 | ns2.online.pt |
| NS | aris-journal.com | 86400 | ns4.online.pt |
| NS | aris-journal.com | 86400 | cp12.online.pt |
| SOA | aris-journal.com | 86400 | cp12.online.pt. cpanel.online.pt. 2026102203 3600 1800 1209600 86400 |
| TXT | aris-journal.com | 3600 | brevo-code:320937717f0d2632e55a6ede5c005904 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.