aquoid.com
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high.
- Global Rank
- #45,943
▼ 981
- Rank in TLD
- #20,654
▼ 558
- Referring Domains
- 1,365
▼ 25
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 14.9
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 17 yr 7 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 14.9
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 12.5
- Referring Domains
- 1,365
- Linked Domains
- 470
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 547
10–19 499
20–29 184
30–39 68
40–49 29
50–59 13
60–69 13
70–79 10
80–89 1
90–100 1
Total 1,365
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wordpress.org | 93.7 | #18 |
| cornell.edu | 80.6 | #424 |
| cmu.edu | 79.4 | #555 |
| ox.ac.uk | 78.9 | #601 |
| wordfence.com | 78.0 | #698 |
| mpg.de | 74.3 | #1,459 |
| msu.edu | 73.8 | #1,606 |
| ed.ac.uk | 72.6 | #2,065 |
| nazwa.pl | 71.9 | #2,373 |
| usp.br | 71.7 | #2,477 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 16 Mar 2009
- Last updated
- 13 Feb 2026
- Expires
- 16 Mar 2027 (131 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- DREAMHOST
Subdomain
pool.aquoid.comwww.aquoid.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | aquoid.com | 60 | 75.119.220.67 |
| MX | aquoid.com | 60 | 0 mx2.dreamhost.com |
| MX | aquoid.com | 60 | 0 mx1.dreamhost.com |
| NS | aquoid.com | 14400 | ns1.dreamhost.com |
| NS | aquoid.com | 14400 | ns3.dreamhost.com |
| NS | aquoid.com | 14400 | ns2.dreamhost.com |
| SOA | aquoid.com | 60 | ns1.dreamhost.com. hostmaster.dreamhost.com. 2026091203 16008 600 1814400 60 |
| TXT | aquoid.com | 60 | v=spf1 mx include:netblocks.dreamhost.com include:relay.mailchannels.net -all |
| TXT | aquoid.com | 60 | google-site-verification=mOHdUstoN4OdY-Ml-_KwqeKfpgcFWnXrN-vmHbkP748 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.