Skip to content

apteka.ru

  • Domain Power global ranking: #48,429

Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high. This domain was registered at least 20 years ago. Links from a broad range of domains appear in the observed data.

Domain Power Rank
54.1
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#48,429

▼ 15,701

Rank in TLD
#623

▼ 184

Referring Domains
2,142

▼ 89

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
19.2
Subdomains
13
Domain age
28 yr 6 mo

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
yandex.ru90.3#47
t.me90.0#50
mail.ru83.1#245
tilda.ws82.3#295
ok.ru81.4#360
yandex.com79.2#568
liveinternet.ru77.1#840
rambler.ru76.3#991
livejournal.com75.9#1,065
rbc.ru75.7#1,129

Basic Information

Registration date
6 Apr 1998
Expires
30 Apr 2027 (176 days remaining)
Registrar
RU-CENTER-RU

Subdomain

api.apteka.ruarticle.apteka.rucito.apteka.ruerr.apteka.ruimages.apteka.rumoscow.apteka.rumt.apteka.ruorto.apteka.rupatronage.apteka.rustatic.apteka.rustoma.apteka.ruwww.web.apteka.ruwww.apteka.ru

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
Aapteka.ru120178.248.238.97
MXapteka.ru1205 mx12.katren.ru
MXapteka.ru12015 mx11.katren.ru
MXapteka.ru1205 mx14.katren.ru
NSapteka.ru3600b.ns.selectel.ru
NSapteka.ru3600d.ns.selectel.ru
NSapteka.ru3600c.ns.selectel.ru
NSapteka.ru3600a.ns.selectel.ru
SOAapteka.ru3600a.ns.selectel.ru. support.selectel.ru. 2026110341 10800 3600 604800 60
TXTapteka.ru120google-site-verification=tix4i8mFs1b0MSssPppIEJaaVxR5gudXnkqJDS_qmsA
TXTapteka.ru120google-site-verification=2J5vYx8-ModdoCofFPEc422duaPeH4G5D5l9KFDZE4g
TXTapteka.ru120v=spf1 ip4:188.124.39.40 include:_spf.katren.ru include:_spf.yandex.net include:spf.unisender.com -all
TXTapteka.ru120mailru-verification: f66fe4b9c2f95ebd

Email Authentication

MX
Valid
SPF
Valid
DMARC
Warning

DMARC is set to p=quarantine, asking receiving servers to quarantine messages that fail authentication.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.