aprose.pt
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #1,482,199
▲ 345,542
- Rank in TLD
- #2,689
▲ 574
- Referring Domains
- 71
▲ 7
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 15.0
- Subdomains
- 4
- Domain age
- 28 yr 5 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 15.0
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 14.0
- Referring Domains
- 71
- Linked Domains
- 41
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 24
10–19 30
20–29 11
30–39 3
40–49 1
50–59 1
60–69 1
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 71
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| sapo.pt | 69.0 | #4,054 |
| jornaldenegocios.pt | 55.9 | #35,854 |
| asf.com.pt | 49.5 | #104,359 |
| montepio.org | 36.9 | #734,767 |
| apseguradores.pt | 35.7 | #885,350 |
| bipar.eu | 35.2 | #949,679 |
| i2sbrokers.pt | 28.7 | #2,747,317 |
| insurancecorp.com.br | 28.0 | #3,084,760 |
| prevoir.pt | 26.6 | #3,781,032 |
| athenas.pt | 25.4 | #4,502,346 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .ptPortugal
- Registration date
- 6 May 1998
- Domain statuses
- Registered
- Registry
- Associação DNS.PT
Subdomain
elearning.aprose.ptformacao.aprose.ptprimavera.aprose.ptwww.aprose.pt
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | aprose.pt | 900 | 185.98.250.164 |
| MX | aprose.pt | 900 | 10 aprose-pt.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | aprose.pt | 900 | ns2.amenworld.com |
| NS | aprose.pt | 900 | ns1.amenworld.com |
| SOA | aprose.pt | 900 | ns1.amenworld.com. root.amen.fr. 2026070201 86400 7200 2592000 300 |
| TXT | aprose.pt | 3600 | v=spf1 a mx ip4:81.84.252.235 ip4:80.172.254.13 ip4:151.236.52.103 ip4:94.76.241.49 ip4:185.98.250.160/27 ip4:195.22.24.132 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.kmitd.com -all |
| TXT | aprose.pt | 3600 | MS=ms51604015 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.