apps.mil
- Domain Power global ranking: #59,922
- Domain Power ranking within .mil: #38
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data. It ranks within the top 100,000 in the global ranking.
- Global Rank
- #59,922
▼ 2,824
- Rank in TLD
- #38
▼ 1
- Referring Domains
- 375
▲ 10
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 34.3
- Subdomains
- 21
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 34.3
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 30.5
- Referring Domains
- 375
- Linked Domains
- 7
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 35
10–19 83
20–29 66
30–39 58
40–49 34
50–59 51
60–69 19
70–79 23
80–89 4
90–100 2
Total 375
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| microsoft.com | 91.9 | #33 |
| outlook.com | 86.2 | #119 |
| linktr.ee | 84.7 | #161 |
| ca.gov | 83.6 | #211 |
| constantcontact.com | 80.6 | #429 |
| upenn.edu | 78.7 | #620 |
| ny.gov | 78.1 | #695 |
| texas.gov | 77.7 | #743 |
| wisc.edu | 77.3 | #812 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .mil
No data
Subdomain
compliance.apps.milconference.apps.milconfig.apps.milwww.dcs.apps.milcmmc.emass.apps.milnisp.emass.apps.miljasm.apps.milauth-hcm04.ns2.apps.mildla-hcm04.ns2.apps.milwww.ohome.apps.milforms.osi.apps.milwww.forms.osi.apps.milonenote.osi.apps.miltasks.osi.apps.milportal.apps.milmanage.protection.apps.milscc.protection.apps.milsafe.apps.milsecurity.apps.milwebmail.apps.mil
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| NS | apps.mil | 1909 | dns1.disa.mil |
| NS | apps.mil | 1909 | dns2.disa.mil |
| NS | apps.mil | 1909 | dns3.disa.mil |
| NS | apps.mil | 1909 | dns4.disa.mil |
| NS | apps.mil | 1909 | dns5.disa.mil |
| SOA | apps.mil | 4011 | dns1.disa.mil. disa\.tinker\.ie\.list\.dci-ii-dns.mail.mil. 2024165138 10800 1080 2419200 900 |
| TXT | apps.mil | 7200 | v=spf1 include:_spf.eemsg.mail.mil -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.