Skip to content

appropedia.org

  • Domain Power global ranking: #59,525

Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high. This domain was registered at least 20 years ago. Links from a broad range of domains appear in the observed data.

Domain Power Rank
52.9
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#59,525

▼ 3,830

Rank in TLD
#6,924

▼ 475

Referring Domains
1,105

▼ 6

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
30.3
Subdomains
10
Domain age
20 yr 7 mo

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
google.com99.8#1
github.com93.6#19
wikipedia.org91.8#34
squarespace.com90.3#46
bit.ly88.4#67
creativecommons.org88.0#76
weebly.com87.4#85
nih.gov87.1#91
outlook.com86.2#119
columbia.edu85.2#151

Basic Information

TLD
.org
Registration date
28 Mar 2006
Last updated
12 Aug 2026
Expires
28 Mar 2027 (143 days remaining)
Registrar
DREAMHOST

Subdomain

asapedia.appropedia.orgblog.appropedia.orgblogs.appropedia.orgde.appropedia.orgdev.appropedia.orgforum.appropedia.orgfoundation.appropedia.orgsmd.appropedia.orgvotre-source-d-informations.appropedia.orgwww.appropedia.org

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
Aappropedia.org300172.66.137.229
Aappropedia.org300172.66.134.50
AAAAappropedia.org3002606:4700:10::ac42:8632
AAAAappropedia.org3002606:4700:10::ac42:89e5
MXappropedia.org3000 aspmx.l.google.com
NSappropedia.org86400karina.ns.cloudflare.com
NSappropedia.org86400luke.ns.cloudflare.com
SOAappropedia.org1800karina.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2418070989 10000 2400 604800 1800
TXTappropedia.org3600google-site-verification=V0qXPOXlmbzEGg1x9NoX3tRUfHJm9c965ULRj417Oa0
TXTappropedia.org3600google-site-verification=aemuaOynTBO4dWBuqoyEAwRPvrbv_52kZ7Lhth2EIKM

Email Authentication

MX
Valid
SPF
Not configured

No matching DNS record was found.

DMARC
Warning

DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.