apecv.pt
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #525,548
▲ 29,383
- Rank in TLD
- #953
▲ 66
- Referring Domains
- 74
▼ 4
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 34.5
- Subdomains
- 4
- Domain age
- No data
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 34.5
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 29.0
- Referring Domains
- 74
- Linked Domains
- 89
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 22
20–29 16
30–39 9
40–49 8
50–59 15
60–69 2
70–79 0
80–89 1
90–100 1
Total 74
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| weebly.com | 87.4 | #85 |
| ugr.es | 64.6 | #7,933 |
| unb.br | 62.5 | #11,264 |
| mec.pt | 59.4 | #19,540 |
| javeriana.edu.co | 58.9 | #21,261 |
| ull.es | 58.5 | #22,919 |
| ufsm.br | 58.4 | #23,609 |
| fwf.ac.at | 57.1 | #29,725 |
| nitech.ac.jp | 54.7 | #43,864 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .ptPortugal
- Expires
- 7 Jan 2027 (63 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- Registered
- Registry
- Associação DNS.PT
Subdomain
insea2006.apecv.ptinvisibilidades.apecv.ptpontes.apecv.ptwww.apecv.pt
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | apecv.pt | 360 | 167.235.168.91 |
| MX | apecv.pt | 360 | 0 apecv.pt |
| NS | apecv.pt | 86400 | ns3.pro-x-web.com |
| NS | apecv.pt | 86400 | ns4.pro-x-web.com |
| NS | apecv.pt | 86400 | ns2.pro-x-web.com |
| NS | apecv.pt | 86400 | ns1.pro-x-web.com |
| SOA | apecv.pt | 86400 | ns1.pro-x-web.com. mail.pro-x-web.com. 2026100100 3600 1800 1209600 86400 |
| TXT | apecv.pt | 3600 | v=spf1 ip4:167.235.168.91 ip4:157.90.34.112 +a +mx +ip4:194.38.133.162 +include:spf.maquinadigital.net +ip4:213.58.130.227 +ip4:213.58.130.230 +ip4:213.58.130.229 +ip4:213.58.130.231 +include:mdtek.at +ip4:213.58.130.224/27 +ip4:194.38.133.160/27 ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.