antram.pt
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #1,234,670
▼ 95,427
- Rank in TLD
- #2,322
▼ 124
- Referring Domains
- 105
▼ 4
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 22.5
- Subdomains
- 4
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 22.5
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 19.9
- Referring Domains
- 105
- Linked Domains
- 419
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 25
10–19 28
20–29 26
30–39 15
40–49 3
50–59 6
60–69 1
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 105
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| sapo.pt | 69.0 | #4,054 |
| jornaldenegocios.pt | 55.9 | #35,854 |
| iru.org | 55.0 | #41,546 |
| imt-ip.pt | 53.3 | #55,737 |
| worldskills.org | 53.2 | #56,326 |
| radius.com | 52.6 | #62,454 |
| apdl.pt | 51.6 | #73,389 |
| amt-autoridade.pt | 43.2 | #295,021 |
| doutorfinancas.pt | 42.9 | #310,644 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .ptPortugal
- Domain statuses
- Registered
- Registry
- Associação DNS.PT
Subdomain
loja.antram.ptritt.antram.ptritt-app.antram.ptwww.antram.pt
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | antram.pt | 3600 | 62.28.7.243 |
| MX | antram.pt | 3600 | 0 antram-pt.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | antram.pt | 172800 | ns1.bdm.microsoftonline.com |
| NS | antram.pt | 172800 | ns2.bdm.microsoftonline.com |
| NS | antram.pt | 172800 | ns3.bdm.microsoftonline.com |
| NS | antram.pt | 172800 | ns4.bdm.microsoftonline.com |
| SOA | antram.pt | 3600 | ns1.bdm.microsoftonline.com. azuredns-hostmaster.microsoft.com. 1 3600 300 2419200 300 |
| TXT | antram.pt | 3600 | mscid=EzS8g1JoBw2ogIo/sZLOGUQOjk2PFBkuFWgUmIZQu9IZZxHCOxNBUmQOBCn4tBqrvn5ovYqFnw+w4qXftLUfbg== |
| TXT | antram.pt | 3600 | v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.