aheta.pt
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #3,460,929
▲ 2,198,547
- Rank in TLD
- #5,919
▲ 3,893
- Referring Domains
- 33
▼ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.2
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.2
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 25.9
- Referring Domains
- 33
- Linked Domains
- 85
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 3
10–19 8
20–29 9
30–39 7
40–49 2
50–59 2
60–69 2
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 33
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| iol.pt | 62.7 | #10,844 |
| theportugalnews.com | 61.2 | #14,076 |
| paperblog.com | 55.1 | #41,283 |
| guestcentric.com | 52.2 | #67,012 |
| postal.pt | 41.6 | #376,892 |
| cm-albufeira.pt | 40.3 | #459,121 |
| teetimes.pt | 32.9 | #1,425,392 |
| eures-andalucia-algarve.eu | 32.7 | #1,466,990 |
| turisver.pt | 32.6 | #1,486,400 |
| portugal.fr | 32.6 | #1,498,138 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .ptPortugal
- Domain statuses
- Registered
- Registry
- Associação DNS.PT
Subdomain
www.aheta.pt
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | aheta.pt | 14400 | 185.12.116.156 |
| MX | aheta.pt | 14400 | 0 mail.aheta.pt |
| NS | aheta.pt | 14400 | pdns2.dnscpanel.com |
| NS | aheta.pt | 14400 | pdns1.dnscpanel.com |
| NS | aheta.pt | 14400 | pdns3.dnscpanel.com |
| SOA | aheta.pt | 14400 | pdns1.dnscpanel.com. tech.flesk.com. 2026101603 3600 1800 1209600 86400 |
| TXT | aheta.pt | 14400 | v=spf1 ip4:185.12.116.156 ip4:94.126.169.102 +a +mx +ip4:94.126.169.141 +include:spf.mailbox.pt ~all |
| TXT | aheta.pt | 14400 | google-site-verification=sfGkflZYz7Nm_-Z3LPu_iAvpxB9-aCndumMzviUVl-g |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.