Skip to content

afpbb.com

  • Domain Power global ranking: #37,422

Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high. This domain was registered at least 20 years ago. Links from a broad range of domains appear in the observed data.

Domain Power Rank
55.7
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#37,422

▼ 2,008

Rank in TLD
#17,004

▼ 1,048

Referring Domains
4,993

▼ 323

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
19.5
Subdomains
16
Domain age
21 yr 4 mo

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
google.com99.8#1
wikipedia.org91.8#34
substack.com84.4#173
tinyurl.com84.1#186
hatena.ne.jp82.7#270
google.co.jp82.4#289
yahoo.co.jp81.5#348
rakuten.co.jp80.6#427
ameblo.jp80.3#460
squareup.com80.0#498

Basic Information

TLD
.com
Registration date
14 Jun 2005
Last updated
15 Apr 2026
Expires
14 Jun 2031 (1,682 days remaining)
Registrar
Network Solutions, LLC

Subdomain

feeds.afpbb.comimg.afpbb.comimg2.afpbb.comimg3.afpbb.comjss.afpbb.comkeywalker.afpbb.commsv.afpbb.combetflix-bet.ssc.afpbb.compggs.ssc.afpbb.comt38.ssc.afpbb.comxn--88casino--yn2a9h8byb12a.ssc.afpbb.comxn--t8--qml1e3aw1s.ssc.afpbb.comxn--w69--3go9e8aza7u.ssc.afpbb.comssl.afpbb.comwww.afpbb.comwww3.afpbb.com

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
Aafpbb.com3600202.238.151.70
MXafpbb.com360020 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
MXafpbb.com360010 aspmx.l.google.com
MXafpbb.com360030 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
MXafpbb.com360050 aspmx3.googlemail.com
MXafpbb.com360040 aspmx2.googlemail.com
NSafpbb.com3600ns01.idcfcloud.com
NSafpbb.com3600ns02.idcfcloud.com
NSafpbb.com3600ns03.idcfcloud.com
SOAafpbb.com3600ns01.idcfcloud.com. phardy.clc.net. 70 10800 3600 604800 3600
TXTafpbb.com3600google-site-verification=6pQtq3g4L69GTDAxeX_39ZSByKpZNsZ5aQdJ51SrZvQ
TXTafpbb.com3600v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Email Authentication

MX
Valid
SPF
Valid
DMARC
Not configured

DMARC is not configured.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.