accelainc.com
This domain has been registered for many years, but its Domain Power Rank is low. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #5,033,500
▼ 122,396
- Rank in TLD
- #2,112,209
▼ 51,809
- Referring Domains
- 40
▼ 5
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 25.0
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 22 yr 2 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 25.0
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 21.3
- Referring Domains
- 40
- Linked Domains
- 1,267
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 7
10–19 13
20–29 8
30–39 7
40–49 2
50–59 1
60–69 1
70–79 1
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 40
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| mhlw.go.jp | 78.9 | #594 |
| ntt.com | 62.2 | #11,854 |
| gamer.com.tw | 58.6 | #22,715 |
| tomba.io | 49.6 | #102,733 |
| an-life.jp | 41.0 | #415,347 |
| minagine.jp | 37.9 | #642,755 |
| my-vision.co.jp | 37.0 | #725,171 |
| paradigm-shift.co.jp | 36.9 | #730,221 |
| agaroot.co.jp | 36.6 | #765,951 |
| xrcloud.jp | 36.1 | #822,632 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 26 Aug 2004
- Last updated
- 5 Nov 2026
- Expires
- 26 Aug 2027 (294 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- ok
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- ENOM, INC.
Subdomain
www.accelainc.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | accelainc.com | 3600 | 162.43.107.135 |
| MX | accelainc.com | 3600 | 0 accelainc.com |
| NS | accelainc.com | 3600 | ns2.wpx.ne.jp |
| NS | accelainc.com | 3600 | ns3.wpx.ne.jp |
| NS | accelainc.com | 3600 | ns1.wpx.ne.jp |
| SOA | accelainc.com | 3600 | ns1.wpx.ne.jp. root.wpx.ne.jp. 0 10800 3600 604800 3600 |
| TXT | accelainc.com | 3600 | v=spf1 +a:sv6114.wpx.ne.jp +a:accelainc.com +mx include:spf.sender.xserver.jp ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.