a.gal
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #1,854,571
▲ 303,469
- Rank in TLD
- #165
▲ 31
- Referring Domains
- 47
▲ 2
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 31.3
- Subdomains
- 8
- Domain age
- 8 yr 0 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 31.3
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 27.8
- Referring Domains
- 47
- Linked Domains
- 592
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 3
10–19 10
20–29 12
30–39 11
40–49 4
50–59 4
60–69 0
70–79 2
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 47
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| wiktionary.org | 76.5 | #943 |
| wikidata.org | 71.6 | #2,513 |
| uni.lodz.pl | 58.0 | #25,179 |
| iscte-iul.pt | 57.0 | #29,737 |
| elcorreogallego.es | 53.2 | #56,097 |
| dominio.gal | 52.9 | #59,288 |
| e-konomista.pt | 45.8 | #195,170 |
| praza.gal | 45.0 | #222,858 |
| gov.mex.com | 42.5 | #330,207 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .gal
- Registration date
- 24 Oct 2018
- Last updated
- 17 Oct 2025
- Expires
- 24 Oct 2027 (353 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientDeleteProhibited clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- Asociación puntoGAL
- Registrar
- Dinahosting s.l.
Subdomain
40anos.a.galbiblioteca.a.galcarvalho.a.galnelida.a.galops.a.galpactodeirmaos.a.galsaramago.a.galwww.a.gal
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | a.gal | 300 | 82.98.190.89 |
| MX | a.gal | 300 | 10 mail.a.gal |
| NS | a.gal | 300 | ns4.dinahosting.com |
| NS | a.gal | 300 | ns3.dinahosting.com |
| NS | a.gal | 300 | ns2.dinahosting.com |
| NS | a.gal | 300 | ns.dinahosting.com |
| SOA | a.gal | 300 | ns.dinahosting.com. hostmaster.a.gal. 2018102908 3600 120 1209600 300 |
| TXT | a.gal | 300 | v=spf1 a mx ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.