5plus.ai
This relatively new domain has few observed referring domains and a low Domain Power Rank.
- Global Rank
- #44,777,544
▼ 26,504,380
- Rank in TLD
- #104,650
▼ 51,847
- Referring Domains
- 1
▼ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 42.0
- Subdomains
- 0
- Domain age
- 2 yr 2 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 42.0
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 42.0
- Referring Domains
- 1
- Linked Domains
- 36
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 0
20–29 0
30–39 0
40–49 1
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 1
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| kauz.ai | 42.0 | #354,019 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .aiAnguilla
- Registration date
- 27 Aug 2024
- Last updated
- 11 Oct 2026
- Expires
- 27 Aug 2028 (661 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- ok
- Registry
- Government of Anguilla
- Registrar
- InternetX
Subdomain
No Observed Data
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 5plus.ai | 150 | 217.160.0.205 |
| AAAA | 5plus.ai | 150 | 2001:8d8:100f:f000::200 |
| MX | 5plus.ai | 150 | 10 5plus-ai.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | 5plus.ai | 150 | shades17.rzone.de |
| NS | 5plus.ai | 150 | docks18.rzone.de |
| SOA | 5plus.ai | 150 | docks18.rzone.de. hostmaster.strato-rz.de. 2024082765 86400 7200 604800 300 |
| TXT | 5plus.ai | 150 | MS=ms24289950 |
| TXT | 5plus.ai | 150 | v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf-de.emailsignatures365.com -all |
| TXT | 5plus.ai | 150 | apple-domain-verification=UsR6mZsCqj7dGp3y |
| TXT | 5plus.ai | 150 | google-site-verification=uLFOF54RnvMHxTYXMdfD0Ml2YQpyYJTcvOcVkpnlL30 |
| TXT | 5plus.ai | 150 | google-site-verification=BHZOS2Owgd3dzEZgBqaKsVwwR81VVJjYsUUglgS1AXk |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=quarantine, asking receiving servers to quarantine messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.