1two.org
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #133,628
▲ 15,153
- Rank in TLD
- #15,614
▲ 1,327
- Referring Domains
- 462
▼ 7
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 15.9
- Subdomains
- 3
- Domain age
- 22 yr 3 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 15.9
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 14.9
- Referring Domains
- 462
- Linked Domains
- 2,785
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 92
10–19 296
20–29 45
30–39 19
40–49 6
50–59 2
60–69 0
70–79 1
80–89 1
90–100 0
Total 462
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wix.com | 88.8 | #61 |
| free.fr | 78.2 | #681 |
| newline.co | 52.9 | #59,002 |
| cherrypy.org | 51.1 | #79,781 |
| catholicmom.com | 48.7 | #120,762 |
| zeleur.com | 44.6 | #235,745 |
| webrankinfo.net | 44.4 | #243,258 |
| disgustingmen.com | 43.5 | #280,961 |
| gov.mex.com | 42.5 | #330,207 |
| permatheque.fr | 42.0 | #358,275 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .org
- Registration date
- 6 Jul 2004
- Last updated
- 6 Dec 2025
- Expires
- 6 Jul 2028 (609 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientDeleteProhibited clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- Public Interest Registry (PIR)
- Registrar
- OVH, SAS
Subdomain
bible.1two.orgblog.1two.orgwww.1two.org
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1two.org | 3600 | 87.98.154.146 |
| AAAA | 1two.org | 3600 | 2001:41d0:301::26 |
| MX | 1two.org | 3600 | 1 mx1.mail.ovh.net |
| MX | 1two.org | 3600 | 100 mx3.mail.ovh.net |
| MX | 1two.org | 3600 | 5 mx2.mail.ovh.net |
| NS | 1two.org | 3600 | ns200.anycast.me |
| NS | 1two.org | 3600 | dns200.anycast.me |
| SOA | 1two.org | 3600 | dns200.anycast.me. tech.ovh.net. 2025120603 86400 3600 3600000 60 |
| TXT | 1two.org | 3600 | 1|www.1two.org |
| TXT | 1two.org | 3600 | v=spf1 include:mx.ovh.com -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.