1gom.vip
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #436,900
▲ 188,050
- Rank in TLD
- #334
▲ 123
- Referring Domains
- 55
▼ 2
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 34.0
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 1 yr 5 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 34.0
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 25.5
- Referring Domains
- 55
- Linked Domains
- 5
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 4
10–19 14
20–29 17
30–39 3
40–49 2
50–59 4
60–69 2
70–79 7
80–89 2
90–100 0
Total 55
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| acm.org | 85.6 | #137 |
| hatena.ne.jp | 82.7 | #270 |
| notion.so | 78.3 | #666 |
| telegra.ph | 72.9 | #1,958 |
| xero.com | 72.8 | #1,971 |
| ning.com | 72.1 | #2,291 |
| ameba.jp | 71.5 | #2,572 |
| wakelet.com | 70.5 | #3,093 |
| vc.ru | 70.1 | #3,304 |
| qiita.com | 69.3 | #3,869 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .vip
- Registration date
- 10 May 2025
- Last updated
- 2 Apr 2026
- Expires
- 10 May 2027 (186 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- Registry Services, LLC
- Registrar
- NAMECHEAP INC
Subdomain
kqxs.1gom.vip
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1gom.vip | 300 | 172.67.158.241 |
| A | 1gom.vip | 300 | 104.21.82.156 |
| AAAA | 1gom.vip | 300 | 2606:4700:3035::6815:529c |
| AAAA | 1gom.vip | 300 | 2606:4700:3034::ac43:9ef1 |
| NS | 1gom.vip | 86400 | cody.ns.cloudflare.com |
| NS | 1gom.vip | 86400 | rosemary.ns.cloudflare.com |
| SOA | 1gom.vip | 1800 | cody.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2414607363 10000 2400 604800 1800 |
| TXT | 1gom.vip | 300 | google-site-verification=Yvd4INz1Yh39ELuBIJKXTQKVHM_nSR20kyb4NPWlihk |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Warning
No MX record was found, but mail delivery may fall back to this domain’s A or AAAA record.
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.